Golf courses Colorado Aurora Fitzsimons Golf Course, CLOSED 2017

Fitzsimons Golf Course, CLOSED 2017

2323 Scranton St, Aurora, Colorado, 80010
Type: Public
No. Holes: 18
(303) 364-8125
-
Architect: Army Corp of Engineers (3)
                      
Fitzsimons Golf Course, CLOSED 2017, Aurora, Colorado, 80010 - Golf Course Photo
Add Course Image

Detailed description of Fitzsimons Golf Course, CLOSED 2017

Fitzsimons Golf Course is a Public, 18 hole golf course located in Aurora, Colorado.

Fitzsimons Golf Course first opened for play in 1918 with just 3 sand greens. In 1939 the course evolved into an 18 hole layout designed by Army Corp of Engineers.

The course was a favorite of former President Dwight Eisenhower. There is a tree located in the middle of the sixth fairway that is named after the former president with a wood plaque that reads “Ike’s Tree.” 

Fitzsimons became an Aurora public golf course in 1998. This tree-lined golf gem is now an attractive cornerstone to a bioscience park with some of the state’s leading hospitals. The redesigned holes on the front nine, done by Richard Phelps in 2004, are a great complement to the old-time layout and strong traditions at Fitzsimons.

The course has tree-lined fairways and elevated greens that are small and fast. A water hazard comes into play on only one hole.

Blue tees: par-71, 6,282 yards, 69.3 / 126(M), 75.2 / 132(W)
White tees: par-71, 5,986 yards, 67.8 / 122(M),   73.2 / 130(W)
Red tees: par-71, 5,606 yards, 70.9 / 123

The course closed December 15, 2017.

The course property will used to expand the Medical Center and Biotech Park.

This course has been reviewed 4 times
Golf Course ranker Photo
Denver, CO

$16 (cart not included), played on Tuesday, June 2015 at 6:21 AM

I play this course 4-5 times per season and conduct a tournament for Colorado and Wyoming youth golfers annually

Would travel: 0-10 Miles, Vacation Worthy
Bottom line: I would play again, Fair priced based on quality and competitive area pricing
 
Price, Pace of Play, Pro Shop, Layout, No Houses on Course
None worth mentioning
Layout/ Challenge
Fairway conditions
Greens conditions
Course ambiance
Pace to play
Overall rating
Value
Rank ID # : 027168
Golf Course ranker Photo
Westminster, CO

$21 (cart not included), played on Friday, August 2010 at 8am

The course was in very good shape. The rough wasn't too long, the grass was mowed and in great shape and the traps and greens were manicured.

Would travel: 10-20 Miles, Not Vacation Worthy
Bottom line: I would play again, Fair priced based on quality and competitive area pricing
 
Condition of Course, Price, No Houses on Course, Staff
Pace of Play
Layout/ Challenge
Fairway conditions
Greens conditions
Course ambiance
Pace to play
Overall rating
Value
Rank ID # : 011143
Golf Course ranker Photo
Aurora, CO

$26 (cart included), played on Sunday, June 2009 at 6am

Love the mellowness of this course.

Would travel: 0-10 Miles, Vacation Worthy
Bottom line: I would play again, Ranks with the best in this price level, Best course in the area
 
Condition of Course, Layout, Price, No Houses on Course, Pace of Play
Food/Bar Facilities
Layout/ Challenge
Fairway conditions
Greens conditions
Course ambiance
Pace to play
Overall rating
Value
Rank ID # : 007134
Golf Course ranker Photo
Denver, CO

$10 (cart included), played on Thursday, October 2008 at 2pm

I have only been playing for 10 years and have played a few courses in the Denver and Aurora area The Fitz course ranks with the best in the area.

Would travel: 0-10 Miles, Vacation Worthy
Bottom line: I would play again, Better than average course for the area, Ranks with the best in this price level, Fair priced based on quality and competitive area pricing
 
Condition of Course, Difficulty, Layout, Price, Pace of Play, Staff, Clubhouse, Pro Shop
Layout/ Challenge
Fairway conditions
Greens conditions
Course ambiance
Pace to play
Overall rating
Value
Rank ID # : 005054
4.0/5
Based on 4 reviews
ForeTee
Download the App
Free – Google Play Free – App Store
Get it Get it
Discussion about this course
No User Comments